Cass. Labor Div., 11 June 2025, no. 24-15.297
An employee was declared unfit for work by the occupational doctor and then dismissed due to physical incapacity and an inability to be redeployed. The doctor’s opinion stated that “any continued employment would be seriously prejudicial to the employee’s health and that this precluded any redeployment”.
The employee challenged her dismissal in court, arguing that:
Having been dismissed by the judges ruling on the merits of the case, the employee appealed to the Court of Cassation.
The Court of Cassation dismissed her appeal. For the first time, the Court affirmed that in the presence of an opinion releasing the employer from its obligation to seek redeployment, the employer:
Thus, the Court of Cassation provides further clarification as to the scope of the obligation to notify the employee in writing of the reasons opposing their redeployment.